CITATION – (2020) 5 SCC 481 FACTS In this case, three appeals were filed which arose from three applications filed by the respondent, Subhash Chandra Agarwal before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the Supreme Court of India Subhash Chandra Agarwal himself filed a Right to Information Application to CPIO of the Supreme Court of India to…
JUDGES 1. Former Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, 2. Justice Kurian Joseph, 3. Justice RF Nariman, 4. Justice SK Kaul and 5. Justice Indu Malhotra. ISSUES Whether the Nagraj Judgement needed reconsideration by a seven-judge bench? The second issue questioned whether the States had to collect quantifiable data to prove the backwardness and inadequacy of…
FACTS 1. This case was a combined hearing by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017, and of the rules framed in consonance of section 184 of the Finance Act was constitutionally challenged before the court. Part XIV of the Finance Act 2017 gave sweeping powers to the Union Government to…
CITATION – [2019] 3 SCR 535 Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd. vs Union of India deals with the constitutional validity of the various existing provisions in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter IBC Code). The case has been finally decided by the Supreme Court on 25 January 2019. Since the enactment of the IBC Code, it is continuously…
MARBURY .V. MADISON (1803). INTRODUCTION Marbury v. Madison, legitimate case in which, on February 24, 1803,the U.S. High Court originally announced a demonstration of Congress unlawful, consequently building up the regulation of legal audit. The court’s perspective, composed by Chief Justice John Marshall, is viewed as one of the reinforcements of U.S. established law. The…
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3661-3662 OF 2020STATE OF BIHAR …..AppellantVERSUSPAWAN KUMAR……..Respondent BENCH- R Sahay, S katriarISSUES In light of the conclusions in (a), (b), and (c) above, we direct the State to do more research in order to prepare a new DSR for the Banka district.” Because…
ARNAB RANJAN GOSWAMI V. UNION OF INDIA 2020. The press is the fourth mainstay of a majority rules government after the Legislature, Executive and Judiciary. Without free and fair political conversation, no appropriate working of the public authority is conceivable. In the Indian express Vs. Association of India[1] case, it was held that the press…
PREM SHANKAR SHUKLA V. DELHI ADMINISTRATION (AIR 1980 SC 1535) The accompanying paper centers around the milestone judgment of the Supreme Court on account of Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration and spreads out the choice of the Supreme Court and its investigation according to different laws and regulations and in the light of chosen…
Alice Corporation Private Limited had a patent claim over a “Computer implemented scheme for mitigating ‘settlement risk’ by using a third-party intermediary”.[1] CLS seeked a declaratory judgement before the US Supreme Court contesting Alice’s claim to be “invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed.”[2] The court held that in accordance with the exception to Section 101 of the US…
In the landmark case of Essar Steel v Satish Kumar Gupta, it was given by the court that there is no residual equity jurisdiction in the Adjudicating Authority or the Appellate Tribunal to interfere in the merits of a business decision taken by the requisite majority of the Committee of Creditors, provided that it is…
