This case was related to medical negligence which was decided on 10th May 1996 and the judge who gave this verdict was Justice Ahmad Sahgir. Medical Negligence generally is the tragic conduct by a clinical expert or expert by not giving adequate thought achieving a break of their commitments and harming the patients who are…
An appeal was preferred against the judgment and order dated 7.1.2020, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, under Section 302 IPC, whereby the appelant was convicted and sentenced for the offence under Section 302 IPC for life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.60,000/-. First information report of this case was registered by complainant, father…
There were two appeals against the same judgement by different accused persons. Hence, both the appeals were being decided together. Appellants Santosh Bind Alias Kallu and Vikash Keshri had challenged the judgement and order dated 20.07.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, under Sections 363/149, 366/149, 376(G)/149, 506 and 368 IPC, whereby accused/appellant in both…
The Supreme Court laid down certain basic “requirements” to be followed in allcases of arrest or detention till legal provisions are made in that behalf as a measureto prevent custodial violence. The requirements read as follows: : The police personnel carrying out the arrest and handling the interrogation of thearrestee would bear accurate, visible and…
By way of appeal, the appellant challenged the Judgment and order dated 08.12.2009 passed by Additional Session Judge, under Sections 376 of IPC, whereby the accused-appellant was convicted under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. On 24.8.2008, the prosecutrix was going alone from her house to break the cucumber in the field, when…
A writ petition was filed for the issuance of writ, order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus thereby commanding the opposite parties to produce the petitioner (detenue) before Court and set free the petitioner with liberty to live with her husband namely Ram Mitra. It was further submitted that the life of the…
An appeal was preferred by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 16.2.2008, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, in Session Trial No.87 of 2007 (State vs. Prakash) arising out of Case Crime No.678 of 2006 under Section 302, 323, 324 IPC, whereby the accused was convicted and awarded sentence under Section 302 IPC for…
Introdution The petitioner in this case, Independent Thought v. Union of India, was a registered organisation dedicated to the protection of children’s rights, while the respondents were the Union of India and the National Commission for Women. The IPC’s Section 375 defines rape and includes a provision defining the age of consent at 18. Section…
A criminal appeal was filed against the judgment and order dated 16.11.2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, whereby the appellant was convicted under section 60(2) of the Excise Act and sentenced for a period of one year along with fine of Rs.1000/- and further the appellant was convicted under section 272 I.P.C. with…
By way of appeal, the appellant- Rajiv @ Paji had challenged the Judgment and order dated 6.5.2013 passed by court of Additional Sessions Judge, whereby the accused-appellant was convicted under Section 376 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.20,000/- and in case of default of payment of fine, to undergo further…
