VARUN TIWARI VS STATE OF U.P. Hon’ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J. The question for consideration in this petition was whether the accused has an indefeasible right to ‘compulsive bail’ i.e. ‘default bail’ under proviso to section 167(2) Cr.P.C. on the expiry of 60 or 90 days as the case may be, if the charge-sheet has…
By means of a writ petition, the petitioners had prayed for direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful matrimonial life. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are major and have solemnized their marriage with each other according to Muslim Rites and Custom on 24.1.2021.…
For citizens and residents, these two terms have been commonly used for a longer period of time now. But it has been commonly confused between these two terms by our general public. So let’s first understand the basic differences between these two terms: Citizenship alludes to an individual’s faithfulness to an administration in return for…
In the case of Upendra Baxi and Lotika Sarkar v. State of Uttar Pradesh also known as the The Agra Home Case a disastrous state was discovered in a Protective Home that was initially constructed and worked under the provisions of SITA allocated under section 1719 and 21 in Agra. This case eventually expanded for…
In Begum v. State which was also an appeal adjudicated by Judge Patel who implied and asserted that the state should prefer alternative ways for solving the issues rather than being inconsiderate towards the victims of prostitution. He further added that it is the hooligans who are a greater threat to society instead of the…
Introduction The term “public tranquility” refers to public peace, and therefore any activity carried out by a group of individuals which results in distortion of peace within the society is referred to as an offence against the public tranquility. The Indian Penal Code, 1860 identifies offences against public tranquility which lays down provisions for “offences against public…
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621 Abstract The landmark ruling in Maneka Gandhi versus Union of India, which stands as a bulwark of the Right of Personal Liberty granted by Article 21 of the Constitution, started when the passport of the petitioner, in this case, was impounded by…
Mathura Rape Case (1972): Summary Abstract The infamous case of Tukaram and Another v. State of Maharashtra, more commonly known as the Mathura Rape Case, sparked off vehemence and uncurbed conflicts, leading to radical changes in the sphere of rape laws governing India. This case witnessed the problem of custodial rape of a young girl…
Sarla Mudgal, (President, Kalyani) and Ors. Vs. Union of India ,Ors. TITLE OF THE CASE: Sarla Mudgal, (President, Kalyani) and Ors. Vs. Union of India ,Ors. CITATION : AIR 1995 SC 1531 COURT : Supreme Court of India DATE DECIDED : 10th May, 1995 APPELLANT : Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani and Ors. RESPONDENT : …
Kesavananda Bharati Vs State Of Kerala Sc 1973 Abstract No doubt, one of the most heard and landmark cases in India because of many obvious reasons. One of them being this case was heard by the largest bench constituted by the Supreme Court of India, a bench consisting of Thirteen Supreme Court Judges. BENCH: 13…
