CASE NAME :- HAMBROOK V STOKES (1925) 1kb 141: 1924 ER Repeal DECIDED :- 1925 CITATION :- (1925) 1kb 141 STATUTES :- Fatal Accident Act 1846 JURISDICTION :- England And Wales CORUM :- Atkin, Bankes, Sargent LJJ FACT OF CASE :- The defendant’s employee left a lorry at the top of a steep narrow street…
INTRODUCTION Everyone in the state of India has the right to live freely and they can buy and sell their property. In India, there are some rules that land of Schedule caste person can only register to the Schedule caste no other person can register the land on their name. FACTS AND ISSUES OF THE…
FACT OF THE CASE: In this case appellant was the employer of salt manufacturing company. He employed both permanent as well as temporary employees. Salt manufacturing situated near a creek opposite to Porbandar town. There was two ways to go to manufacturing company . On over land it takes six to seven miles takes to…
Analyzing the “last” jury trial in India? “ If the crowds outside had known who the lone dissenter was, they would have lynched me. But I saw the evidence and it was apparent that he killed him.” -Reginald Pierce, Juror, Nanavati Trial Introduction A jury refers to a “a group of people…
Court: Supreme Court of India JUDGMENT DATE: 19 January 2022 JUDGES: Justice B.R. Gavai, Justice B.V. Nagarathna, Justice L. Nageswara Rao PARTIES Complainants (s): Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. Respondent (s): B. Vijaya Sai and others SUBJECT In the current case, an appeal was lodged with the Supreme Court of India against an order of the…
CITATION: SUPREME COURT DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 15 April, 2014 JUDGES: Justice K. S. Radhakrishnan and Justice A. K. Sikri. PARTIES: 1) National Legal Services Authority (Primary petitioner) 2) Poojaya Mata Nasib Kaur Ji Women Welfare Society 3) Laxmi Narayan Tripathy Vs. 4) Union of India (Defendant) RELEVANCY: GENDER EQUALITY TO “TRANSENDERS” FACTS The transsexual community…
Court Name- Supreme Court of India Citation- (2019) 11 SCC 1; 2018 (8) SCJ 609 Decided On- 28.09.2018 Hon’ble Judges/Coram- Justice DipakMisra, A.M. Khanwilkar, RohintonFaliNariman, Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra. Parties of the case:- Indian Young Lawyers Association (Petitioner) Travancore Devasom Board (Respondent) State of Kerala (Respondent) Pandalam Royal Family (Respondent) Chief Thanthri –…
Introduction: One of the most basic parts of regular transactions is contract. In our daily lives, we come across contracts everywhere. Indian Contract Act of 1872 governs contracts in India. The case of Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt[i] is still one of the most often referenced in contract law. It was one of the first…
IntroductionArticle 142 of the Indian Constitution, which appears to be a benign procedural adjunct to the Supreme Court’s powers based on its phraseology, has emerged as one of the court’s most powerful tools for judicial activism and innovation. In reality, it has evolved into a new source of substantive power. The origins, evolution, and dispute…
E. M. SANKARAN NAMBOODIRIPAD Vs T. NARAYANAN NAMBIAREquivalent citation : 1970 AIR 2015, 1971 SCR (1) 697Bench: Hidayatullah, M.(Cj)PETITIONER: E. M. SANKARAN NAMBOODIRIPADRESPONDENT: T. NARAYANAN NAMBIARDATE OF JUDGEMENT: 31/07/1970BENCH:HIDAYATULLAH, M. (CJ)MITTER, G. K.RAY, A.N.CITATION INFO:R 1972 SC1515 (10)R 1988 SC1208 (9)ACT:Contempt of court-what is-chief minister of state making remark in public derogatory of thejudiciary and…
