CRIMINAL LIABILITY -STRICT LIABILITY 

Strict obligation crimes are those in which the respondent is held obligated for a criminal offense he committed, even in case mens rea is missing. In spite of the fact that the litigant did not expect any hurt by his activities and was totally unconscious that he was committing an illicit act, the convention of strict obligation holds him obligated for the criminal offenses committed. Because of the regard for due handle within the United States, the tremendous majority of strict obligation wrongdoings are less genuine offenses. Most cases of strict obligation are minor infractions and misdemeanors, not about as genuine as felonies, but still justifying overwhelming fines and up…

ABSOLUTE LIABILITY

The rule of absolute liability, in basic words, can be characterized as the rule of strict liability short the exceptions. In India, the rule of absolute liability advanced within the case of MC Mehta v Union of India. Usually, one of the foremost points of interest judgment which relates to the concept of absolute liability. The truths of the case are that a few oleum gas spilled in a specific range in Delhi from industry. Due to the spillage, numerous individuals were influenced. The Apex Court at that point advanced the rule of outright obligation on the rule of strict obligation and expressed that the respondent would be at risk for the harm caused without considering the special cases to the…

STRICT LIABILITY

Introduction:  Sometimes there are situations where people are held liable for  some harm even though they are not at fault and do not have any  intention to cause harm. Also known as “NO Fault Liability”, Strict  Liability can be defined as the legal responsibility for damages, or  injury, even if the person found strictly liable…

Rylands V. Fletcher

 Rylands V Fletcher, played an important role in tort law and it is a landmark judgement. The defendant in this case had a plan to construct a reservoir on his land for the purpose of providing water to his mill. For the construction of the reservoir he employed independent contractors. While digging there were disused…

Vicarious Liability

Introduction: Liability for commission of tortious acts usually only attaches to a person who commits such tortious acts. There however exists an exception to this general norm. Under certain circumstances, liability for commission of tortious acts attaches to a person who has not actually committed the tortious act, under the law of torts such a…

Is the constant expansion of the definition of “Passing off” for good?

The Principle of Passing off is basically the law against the tort committed by an entity when he unintentionally or deliberately misrepresents or passes off his goods or services as those of another party’s without that party’s consent and this law is used to enforce registered as well as unregistered trademark rights. The principle of…