Families and marriage are frequently seen as the cornerstones of civilization. As long as there have been marriages, adultery has been among humans. It brings tremendous emotions to the forefront and has repercussions for everyone involved. It naturally creates friction between the parties involved, as well as between their sexual impulses and allegiance. Adultery is a significant issue, and there has always been a discrepancy in the relevant court rulings. The main purpose is to determine which circumstantial evidence qualifies as adultery proof. The phrase “living in adultery” refers to overt adulterous behavior, and the respondent maintained a quasi-permanent relationship with a person other than the petitioner or for the explicit goal of engaging in adultery. Illegal conception, keeping a mistress as a concubine, or living as a concubine do not constitute living in adultery. 

After the marital Laws (Amendment) Act came into effect, even a single voluntary sexual act by any party to the marriage with a person other than his or her spouse will be grounds for divorce for the other spouse. According to Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, adultery is defined as “whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence.” 

Adultery is prohibited by personal laws everywhere and is a potential basis for divorce or separation. In a marriage proceeding, the party making the accusation bears the burden of proving adultery. In “proceedings under the Act being initially of a civil nature,” the preponderance of the evidence standard of proof is used rather than proving something beyond a reasonable doubt. General proof of the husband’s bad reputation, the vulgar company he keeps, or even the fact that he is aware of prostitutes’ addresses and was observed with dubious women, would not prove or probabilistically indicate adultery.

ADULTERY AS PER LAW

Section 497 forbids adultery committed with a married woman without her better half’s consent or collusion. The main element of adultery is that only the male culpable person has been rendered punished. In accordance with Section 497’s text, having sex with an unmarried woman does not automatically constitute adultery. In fact, if the married woman’s partner accepts, even because of the married women, the respondent is not in danger. 

Sections 497 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 198 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code19, when read together, form an unbreakable unit that is an authoritative parcel for handling an offence committed by a member of the wedding unit who attacks the tranquilly and security of the marital unit and poisons the relationship between the two accomplices that make up the wedding unit. The law does not envision any of the partners being disciplined on account of one another. A husband is not permitted to accuse his unfaithful wife on the grounds that she is not considered to be guilty in the eyes of the law. 

If a hitched lady establishes a physical relationship with another man, this situation is gravely unacceptable in Indian culture. It is also terrible for a man to allow his partner to end up in bed with another man. A detailed police complaint was filed against a man in a number of incidents where a married woman was discovered in a compromising position with another man. It was determined after a court of law trial that the woman was a willing member but that the spouse had not given her approval. Because of this, the assault violation could not be shown, and despite the fact that the spouse had not consented, the man could not be held accountable under Section 497 IPC. The cause is specific. Unless the woman’s significant other files a complaint in accordance with Provision 198 Cr PC, 1973, the crime under Section 497 IPC is not cognizable, and no court is required to take cognizance of the offence under this section.

CASE LAWS

In the case of Subbarma vs Saraswathi, Madras High Court said that if an unrelated person is found with the wife after midnight, it may be considered as an adulterous act.

In Sowmithri Vishnu vs. Union of India and another, the Petitioner lengthened the scope of arguments to question the validity of Section 497 as being conflicting to Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution, furthering ideas of women as being mere chattel. The Court remained sceptical, and saw these arguments as tumbling in the realm of policy rather than law. 

CONCLUSION

According to Indian criminal law, adultery is only punishable when the “outsider” is a man and the “outsider” breached the marriage home’s sacredness. It is therefore legal discrimination based on gender. Without a doubt, such a rule appears to be at odds with both the spirit of the Constitution’s protection of gender equality as well as current ideas about women’s status in the twenty-first century. Because it discriminates on the basis of sex and upholds equal justice for all citizens, the criminal conversation penalty as it stands now is unconstitutional. If this law is to be kept in effect today, I believe it needs to undergo significant modifications. 

REEFERNCES

• Kala, N. B., & Anuradha, A. (2019). The Social Impact of the Supreme Court Ruling on Adultery in India: An Analysis. IUP Law Review, 9(3).

• Nanda, H., & Chaudhury, M. (2020). DIVORCE TRENDS IN INDIA. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(6), 5125-5131.

• Agarwal, S. Decriminalization of Adultery in India: Judiciary Once again Proves to be the Saviour. Editor’s Desk, 154.

• Shaw, I. The justified parity of right and obligation of divorce in India.

Aishwarya Says:

I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.

IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME, DO LET ME KNOW.

Do follow me on Facebook, Twitter  Youtube and Instagram.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at secondinnings.hr@gmail.com

In the year 2021, we wrote about 1000 Inspirational Women In India, in the year 2022, we would be featuring 5000 Start Up Stories.