This article has been written by Ms. Tashveen Kaur , a 1st year BA LLB student from Army Institute of Law ,Mohali.
Introduction
India is a country that values free speech and freedom of expression. However, there are certain regulations and guidelines in place to ensure that the media and entertainment industry do not cross certain boundaries that may be deemed harmful to the society.
The main regulatory body that oversees the media and entertainment industry in India is the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The ministry is responsible for issuing licenses to broadcasters, regulating content on television and radio, and ensuring compliance with the rules and regulations related to media and entertainment.
Freedom and regulation of media from historical perspective
The history of media regulation and freedom is complex and varied, shaped by cultural, political, and technological developments throughout the centuries. Here are some key historical events and trends that have influenced media freedom and regulation:
The invention of the printing press in the 15th century allowed for mass production and dissemination of information, leading to the rise of newspapers, pamphlets, and books. However, this newfound freedom of expression was often met with censorship and persecution by governments and religious authorities.
The Enlightenment in the 18th century brought about a greater emphasis on individual rights and freedoms, including freedom of speech and the press. This led to the establishment of the first press freedoms in countries like the United States and France.
The 19th century saw the development of telegraphy and the rapid expansion of newspaper circulation. Governments began to see the power of the media in shaping public opinion and began to regulate it more heavily, particularly during times of war or political turmoil.
The 20th century brought about new forms of mass media, including radio and television, which further expanded the reach and influence of media. Governments and private entities became even more involved in regulating media content and ownership, often in the name of national security or public interest.
The rise of the internet and digital media in the late 20th and early 21st century has brought about new challenges and opportunities for media freedom and regulation. On the one hand, the internet has allowed for greater diversity of voices and democratization of information. On the other hand, it has also given rise to new forms of censorship and disinformation, as well as concerns over privacy and data protection.
Throughout history, the tension between freedom and regulation of media has been a recurring theme. While some level of regulation is necessary to prevent harm and ensure fair access to information, too much regulation can stifle creativity and limit freedom of expression. Finding the right balance is an ongoing challenge for governments, media organizations, and individuals alike.
Freedom and regulation of media from constitutional perspective
The Constitution of India recognizes the freedom of the press as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a), which guarantees freedom of speech and expression to all citizens. However, this right is subject to reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order, decency, and morality, among other grounds listed under Article 19(2).
The regulation of media in India is primarily governed by the Press Council of India, which was established under the Press Council Act, 1978. The council is responsible for preserving the freedom of the press, maintaining and improving the standards of newspapers and news agencies, and ensuring the accountability of the press to the public. The council has the power to admonish, censure or even prohibit the publication of newspapers or news agencies that violate journalistic norms or ethics.
Apart from the Press Council of India, there are other regulatory bodies such as the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting that regulate the broadcasting industry in India. TRAI oversees the functioning of the television and radio broadcasting industry, while the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is responsible for the regulation of the print media, films, and broadcasting.
However, concerns have been raised about the regulation of media in India, with critics arguing that the government often uses regulations to stifle free speech and curtail press freedom. The government has also been criticized for its use of defamation laws to suppress critical reporting.
Freedom and regulation of entertainment from historical perspective
The regulation of entertainment in India has been a topic of discussion for centuries, with various rulers and governments imposing restrictions and censorship on artistic expression. However, the concept of freedom of expression and entertainment has also been present in Indian history.
During the Mughal era (1526-1857), music, dance, and poetry were highly valued, and artists were patronized by the royal courts. However, there were also restrictions on the content of artistic expression, with some rulers imposing bans on certain types of music and dance that were deemed immoral or inappropriate.
During British colonial rule in India (1858-1947), the British government imposed strict censorship on literature, films, and other forms of entertainment. The Indian Penal Code of 1860 included provisions that allowed the government to punish individuals for producing or distributing obscene material.
After India gained independence in 1947, the government continued to regulate entertainment, with the aim of promoting moral and cultural values. The Cinematograph Act of 1952 established the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), which is responsible for certifying films for public exhibition. The board is authorized to make cuts or modifications to films that are deemed inappropriate or offensive.
In the 1970s, the Indian government imposed stricter regulations on the film industry, with the aim of promoting Indian culture and values. This led to a period of censorship and control, with films being banned or heavily censored if they were deemed to be anti-establishment or against the cultural norms.
However, in recent years, there has been a push for greater freedom of expression and entertainment in India. In 2016, the CBFC came under criticism for censoring the film “Udta Punjab,” which was critical of drug use in the state of Punjab. The controversy led to calls for greater freedom of expression and a more liberal approach to censorship.
Today, India’s entertainment industry is vibrant and diverse, with a range of films, TV shows, and other forms of entertainment being produced. While there are still restrictions and regulations in place, there is also a growing acceptance of the importance of artistic freedom and expression.
Freedom and regulation of entertainment from constitutional perspective
In India, the freedom and regulation of entertainment are governed by the Constitution of India, which is the supreme law of the land. Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, which includes the freedom to receive and impart information and ideas through any medium, including entertainment.
However, this right is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) of the Constitution, which includes restrictions in the interests of public order, decency, and morality. These restrictions have been interpreted broadly by the courts in India to regulate the content of entertainment, particularly in the areas of obscenity, defamation, and hate speech.
The regulation of entertainment in India is primarily governed by the Cinematograph Act, 1952, which provides for the certification of films for public exhibition. The act establishes the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), which is responsible for certifying films based on their content and issuing them with a certificate (U, U/A, A or S).
The CBFC has often come under criticism for its conservative approach and the arbitrary manner in which it censors films. There have been several instances where films have been banned or faced cuts for their political or social commentary.
Apart from the Cinematograph Act, other laws such as the Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 also regulate the content of entertainment.
In recent years, there has been a debate on the need for self-regulation in the entertainment industry, particularly in the digital space. The government has proposed the creation of a self-regulatory body for digital content, but the proposal has faced criticism for its potential to stifle creative expression and infringe on the right to freedom of speech and expression.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the Constitution of India guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, the regulation of entertainment in India is subject to reasonable restrictions in the interests of public order, decency, and morality.
References
Aishwarya Says:
Law students often face problems, which they cannot share with their friends and families. We have started a column on our website Student’s Corner. In this column we are talking to several law students about the challenges that they face. Students who are interested in participating in the same, can fill this Google Form.
IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME, DO LET ME KNOW.
The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.
If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems to aishwarya@aishwaryasandeep.com
Join our Whatsapp Group for latest Job Opening