This article has been written by Ms. Tashveen Kaur , a 1st year BA LLB student from Army Institute of Law ,Mohali
Introduction
What comes to our mind when we say the word ‘democracy’? – Freedom . But this freedom must balance with one’s rights so thus the invesgative journalism must maintain a balance between the two. Let’s read about them in detail.
What is investigative journalism?
Investigative journalism is a type of journalism that involves in-depth research analysis or reporting on a specific issue or event. The aim of investigative journalism is to uncover hidden information and expose wrongdoing,corruption and other important issues that would otherwise go unreported. This type of journalism often require extensive research, access to confidential sources, and a commitment to uncover the truth,no matter how difficult or dangerous it is .
Investigative journalism has played a crucial role in uncovering important stories and holding those in power accountable. Some notable examples include: the Watergate scandal of 1970s, the exposure of the Iran- Contra Affairs of 1980s and the recent reporting on the Panama Papers, which revealed widespread tax evasion and financial fraud by powerful individuals and corporations.
Investigative journalism presents many challenges and potential dangers due to its focus on uncovering sensitive information and exposing the actions of powerful individuals and organizations. As a result, journalists who engage in this type of reporting must carefully consider and address a variety of legal and ethical concerns. These can include navigating privacy laws, ensuring the confidentiality of sources, and striving for accuracy and fairness in their reporting. The complexities of these issues highlight the importance of responsible and ethical investigative journalism practices.
Advantages of investigative journalism
Investigative journalism has many advantages, including:
Uncovering important issues: Investigative journalism often sheds light on issues and problems that would otherwise go unnoticed or be covered up, such as corruption, fraud, human rights abuses, and environmental degradation.
Keeping a check on people those in power : By exposing wrongdoing and corruption, investigative journalism can help to keep check on those in power and bring about positive change.
Promoting transparency: Investigative journalism helps to promote transparency and openness in government and other institutions, which can lead to improved decision-making and better outcomes.
Informing the public: Investigative journalism provides the public with important information and insights that they would not otherwise have access to, enabling them to make informed decisions and participate in democracy.
Disadvantages of investigative journalism
Investigative journalism also has its disadvantages, including:
Threats to safety: Investigative journalists may face physical danger and even threats to their lives when reporting on sensitive and controversial topics.
Legal challenges: Investigative journalists may face legal challenges, such as lawsuits for defamation or invasion of privacy, which can be costly and time-consuming to defend.
Reliance on confidential sources: Investigative journalism often relies on confidential sources, which can be difficult to verify and may have their own motivations for providing information.
Potential for inaccuracies: Due to the complexity of the issues they cover and the pressure to break stories quickly, investigative journalists may sometimes get details wrong or be misled by unreliable sources.
Right to Privacy
In India, the right to privacy is enshrined in the Indian Constitution as a fundamental right under Article 21. The Indian Supreme Court has recognized privacy as a constitutional right and has held that the right to privacy is an indispensable part of right to life and liberty.
In India, the right to privacy is not absolute, and can be limited if it conflicts with other rights, such as the right to free speech and the right to information. For example, the Indian government can collect personal information for certain purposes, such as national security or the prevention of crime, but it must be done in a manner that is proportionate to the harm that it seeks to prevent.
In the context of journalism, the right to privacy in India can come into conflict with the journalists’ right to report information that is in the public interest. The Indian media has a long tradition of investigative journalism, and journalists often report on sensitive and controversial topics, such as corruption and abuse of power.
However, there have been cases in India where journalists have been sued for invasion of privacy, and the courts have had to balance the right to privacy against the right to free speech and the right to information. In these cases, the Indian courts have generally taken a nuanced approach, balancing the right to privacy against the public’s right to know and the importance of investigative journalism in exposing wrongdoing.
Overall, the right to privacy is an important consideration for journalists in India, and it is crucial for journalists to be mindful of privacy laws and ethical considerations when gathering and reporting information. They should take care to balance the public’s right to know against the right to privacy, and only report information that is necessary to serve the public interest.
Conflict between Investigative journalism and right to privacy
Investigative journalism and the right to privacy are often in tension with each other, as investigative journalists often seek to expose sensitive information that may invade an individual’s privacy. This can lead to difficult ethical and legal dilemmas for journalists, as they must balance between the right of people to know about sensitive topic and one’s privacy.
On one hand, investigative journalism can play a crucial role in uncovering corruption, abuse of power, and other forms of wrongdoing, and can serve as a watchdog for the public. This type of journalism often requires the gathering of sensitive information, such as personal financial records or confidential documents, which may invade an individual’s privacy.
On the other hand, the right to privacy is a fundamental human right that is recognized in many countries, including the right to keep personal information confidential, the right to control one’s own image and likeness, and the right to make personal decisions free from government intrusion.
In some cases, the right to privacy may have to be limited in order to serve the public’s right to know, and journalists may have to make difficult decisions about whether to publish information that invades an individual’s privacy in the public interest. In these cases, the balance between privacy and the public’s right to know must be carefully considered, and journalists should take care to only report information that is necessary to serve the public interest.
In general, it is important for journalists to be mindful of privacy laws and ethical considerations when gathering and reporting information, and to balance the right to privacy against the public’s right to know. This can help ensure that investigative journalism remains a powerful tool for holding those in power accountable, while also respecting the privacy and dignity of individuals
Case laws
There have been several notable case laws regarding the conflict between investigative journalism and the right to privacy in India. Some of the most significant cases include:
R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1994 SCC (6) 632)– This case involved the publication of an unauthorized biography of a convicted murderer. The Supreme Court of India held that the right to privacy is not absolute, and can be overridden by other interests, such as freedom of speech and expression, if it is in the public interest.
People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (AIR 1997 SC 568) – This case involved the publication of a report on the alleged misappropriation of funds by a public authority. The Supreme Court of India held that the right to privacy can be overridden by the right to information if the information is in the public interest and has a bearing on the discharge of a public duty.
Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India ((2016) 7 SCC 221) – This case involved the publication of articles by a leading Indian news magazine on the alleged financial irregularities of a business group. The Supreme Court of India held that the right to privacy can be overridden by the right to freedom of speech and expression if the information is in the public interest.
These cases demonstrate that the relationship between investigative journalism and the right to privacy in India is complex, and that the balance between these rights is often determined on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific facts of each case and the public interest involved.
Conclusion
This, we can conclude that in order to take benefits of investigative journalism, we need to look up at certain limitations carefully and right to privacy must not be violated.
References
Aishwarya Says:
Law students often face problems, which they cannot share with their friends and families. We have started a column on our website Student’s Corner. In this column we are talking to several law students about the challenges that they face. Students who are interested in participating in the same, can fill this Google Form.
IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THE SAME, DO LET ME KNOW.
The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.
If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems to aishwarya@aishwaryasandeep.com
Join our Whatsapp Group for latest Job Opening