December 23, 2020

Islamic Law – Sunnah and Quran Part 2

“Ijma” (consensus of opinion)

Ijma has been define as the agreement of the Muslim jurisconsults in any particular age on a a juridical rule. The Authority of Ijma as a source of law is founded on Quranic and Sunnah Texts; one each of which is given here;

“O ye who believe , Obey God and obey the Prophet and those of you who are in authority, and if ye have a dispute concerning any matter refer it to God and the Prophet.”

(Quran 4:59)

“There can be no consensus on error or misguided behaviour amongst my people.”

(Tradition)

Ijma has been classified into three types:

  • Ijma of the companions of the Prophet (Ijma Us- Sahabd)
  • Ijma of the jurists (Ijma ul Fuqaha)
  • Ijma of the people (Ijma ul Ummah)

While the first type is universally accepted and is incapable of being repealed, the other two types are somewhat disputed.

The Shia School did not accept Ijma except when it emanated from the family of the Prophet or unless the jurisconsults were endorsed in their consensus by the infallible Shia Islam. Sunnis on the other hand, hold that since Quran enunciated only a few rules of law which, after the death of the Prophet, who used to give guidance, and by no means sufficient to cover the numerous questions of the day-to-day developments, Ijma becomes necessary in the circumstances. As the learned alone are competent to make such deductions, their opinion on any question must be of valid authority.

Ijma may be constituted by decision expressed in words or by practice. Both are equally authoritative.

A few of the important requirements for the validity of Ijma are 1) it shall not come into conflict with the Quran or Hadith 2) Once a question is determined by Ijma, it cannot be reopened by individual jurists; 3) One Ijma may be reversed by a subsequent Ijma; and 4) When the jurists of an age have expressed only two views on a particular question, a third view is inadmissible.

In the opinion of Abdur Rahim, there is one serious defect in the rules regarding Ijma. It is the omission to provide a definite and workable machinery for the selection of the jurists who are qualified to take part in Ijma, and for ascertaining, collecting and preserving the results of their deliberations in an authoritative form.

Ijma has made a worthy contribution to Islamic Law since it has been made possible changes to suit the needs of changing times and usages, and in as much as it has been influenced by the opinions of jurists in all cases not provided for in the Quran or the traditions, or where those provisions were not explicit.

Aishwarya Says:

I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.

If you are interested in participating in the same, do let me know.

Do follow me on FacebookTwitter  Youtube and Instagram.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at adv.aishwaryasandeep@gmail.com

We also have a Facebook Group Restarter Moms for Mothers or Women who would like to rejoin their careers post a career break or women who are enterpreneurs.

You may also like to read:

Migrant Crisis and CAA

Secularism and CAA

Legal History of Education in India

Related articles