March 1, 2024

SEBI’s role in regulating depository participants: Safeguarding investor Interest

This article has been written by Ms. Drishti Rawat, a second-year student at National Law University, Delhi.

Abstract

This article examines the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) regulatory framework for depository participants (DPs) in safeguarding investor interests. DPs act as crucial intermediaries enabling investors to hold and transact securities in dematerialized form. Robust regulation of DPs is thus essential for maintaining the integrity and smooth functioning of India’s securities market depository infrastructure.  

The article discusses the main components of SEBI’s regulatory approach including eligibility criteria for DP registration, ongoing compliance requirements concerning systems, disclosures and processes, inspections, investor grievance mechanisms and enforcement through penalties.  

It analyzes how each facet of regulation aims to strengthen DPs’ governance, operational capabilities and service standards in order to protect investor assets and uphold investor rights. The measures ultimately boost investor confidence in the depository mechanism and enable its stable growth. 

Introduction

The dematerialization of securities was a landmark development in India’s capital markets, enabling paperless trading of securities. Previously, securities were held in physical certificate form. To facilitate holding of securities in electronic form, depositories such as National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) and Central Depository Services Limited (CDSL) were established. These depositories allow investors to hold and transact securities in dematerialized or demat form, through a network of demat accounts.  

Depository participants (DPs) are intermediaries that provide investors access to depository services. DPs register investors, open demat accounts, facilitate credit and debit of securities during transactions, and generate investor account statements. They are a crucial link between depositories and investors.  

With the entire settlement system now centered around the demat structure, seamless and reliable functioning of DPs is imperative for investor confidence and market integrity. However, lack of regulation of DPs earlier led to issues like delays, fraud and system failures, adversely affecting investor interests. This created a need for oversight of DPs by a regulator. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) took on this role by introducing regulations for DPs in 1996. SEBI’s objectives are to protect investor rights, maintain the smooth functioning of the depository system and prevent malpractices by DPs through its regulatory framework. 

SEBI’s Regulatory Framework for DPs

  1. Registration Requirements  

To act as a depository participant, entities must obtain a certificate of registration from SEBI under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996. The eligibility criteria stipulate certain financial and capability requirements:  

Must be a body corporate with a net worth of at least ₹100 crores. Higher net worth denotes financial soundness. 

Should have adequate office space, equipment, communication facilities, systems and procedures, as well as trained staff, to function as a DP. This ensures technological and infrastructural capability. 

Should submit a business plan specifying the securities segment and types of clients proposed to be serviced. Allows SEBI to assess preparedness. 

Should not have been barred by any regulator from acting as a DP. Checks for lack of integrity. 

By stipulating eligibility criteria for registration, SEBI aims to ensure only fit and proper entities handle the critical functions of a DP.   

  1. Ongoing Compliance   

Once registered, DPs must continually comply with various operational, reporting and disclosure regulations prescribed by SEBI:   

  • Maintain the prescribed regulatory net worth at all times. 
  • Follow rules regarding appointment of directors and key management personnel. 
  • Implement effective systems for grievance redressal and have desk for walk-in investors. 
  • Abide by the code of conduct laid down by SEBI while dealing with clients. 
  • Submit periodic returns in specified formats covering financials, client asset balances, complaints and inspections. 
  • Undergo annual audit by independent auditor and file report with SEBI. 
  • SEBI monitors compliance through scrutiny of submitted documents as well as inspections. 
  1. Inspections and Audits   

SEBI directly inspects DPs to verify compliance with regulations. Inspections can be regular or triggered by complaints. SEBI also reviews the annual audit reports submitted by DPs. Inspections and audits help detect non-compliance or deficiencies in systems, processes and human resources of DPs. Appropriate corrective/enforcement action can then be taken to maintain investor protection.  

  1. Complaints Redressal   

SEBI requires DPs to resolve investor grievances within 30 days through robust redressal mechanisms. DPs have to file monthly reports on complaints received, resolved and pending. SEBI also operates a centralized web-based complaints redress system called SCORES, which allows online lodging and tracking of complaints against DPs. This enables SEBI to monitor grievances and ensure timely redressal. 

  1. Penalties for Non-Compliance   

To enforce compliance, SEBI can impose monetary penalties on DPs and their officials for regulatory violations. SEBI also has powers to suspend a DP’s certificate of registration for contraventions. In extreme cases, the registration can also be cancelled by SEBI to protect investors from potential harm. The strong deterrent penalties compel DPs to follow regulations strictly. 

How SEBI Regulation Safeguards Investors

  1. Eligibility Criteria Enhances DP Capabilities

The eligibility criteria for DP registration enhance their capabilities in multiple ways:

  • The net worth requirement results in only financially sound entities becoming DPs. This reduces risks of loss of investor securities due to deficient DP systems.
  • The infrastructure and systems requirements ensure that DPs have adequate technological capacity to handle investor accounts safely and efficiently.
  • Screening of business plans allows SEBI to verify the preparedness of DPs for delivering quality services across various market segments and clients.
  • Bar on entities penalized by regulators checks for lack of integrity and commitment to investor interests.

Together, the eligibility norms mandate that only capable entities with high financial and technological competence as well as integrity can become DPs. This significantly strengthens the protection of investor assets and interests.

  1. Compliance Requirements Ensure Standardized Services

By prescribing detailed compliance responsibilities spanning operations, reporting, systems and governance, SEBI establishes minimum standards of service delivery that investors can expect from DPs:

  • The net worth requirement means the continued financial ability to absorb risks/shocks and avoid disruption of services.
  • The code of conduct defines clear guidelines for DP’s interactions with clients, ensuring fair conduct.
  • Mandating the grievance desk and TAT for complaint resolution ensures investor issues are quickly resolved.
  • Frequent reporting and disclosures make operations transparent and detectable if standards slip.
  • Annual third-party audits provide external validation that processes adhere to prescribed norms.

These responsibilities across all key result areas are aimed at ensuring every investor receives at least a baseline standardized quality of depository services.

  1. Inspections and Audits Detect Deficiencies

Regular inspections enable SEBI to directly assess the level of regulatory compliance and detect lacunae in DPs systems and operations. These could relate to record keeping, security measures, handling of investor accounts/assets, grievance resolution, etc. Early detection facilitates timely corrective steps.

Scrutiny of external audit reports provides further independent verification of potential non-compliance or deficiencies. Audits also benchmark DPs against regulations each year to assess service standards.

Together, inspections and audits act as an effective tool to identify and address gaps that could adversely affect investor interests due to DPs negligence or malpractices.

  1. Complaints Redressal Empowers Investors

By mandating complaint resolution mechanisms like SCORES, SEBI has empowered investors to directly approach DPs for the redressal of grievances in a structured manner. SCORES allows easy lodging and tracking of complaints online, enabling investors to avoid lengthy litigation.

A strict 30-day resolution timeframe forces DPs to promptly resolve issues raised by investors. Coupled with monitoring by SEBI, the complaints channel protects investors from delays/harassment and builds confidence.

  1. Penalties Deter Malpractices by DPs

SEBI’s ability to levy penalties acts as a strong deterrent against malpractices by DPs that could jeopardize investor interests, such as:

  • Misuse of client securities or lack of due diligence
  • Delays in executing delivery instructions
  • Refusal to resolve investor grievances
  • Attempts to avoid regulatory audits/inspections

Heavy fines make such actions financially unviable for DPs. Suspension of registration acts as a severe disincentive as it hampers operations. Cancellation of registration would render the entire infrastructure useless and cause massive losses.

The scale and force of penalties make non-compliance injurious for DPs, compelling them to focus on investor service quality.

  1. Disclosures Assist Investor Decision-Making

SEBI mandates regular disclosure of information by DPs relating to financials, operations, client assets and complaints. Public availability of such disclosures in standard formats enables investors to:

  • Gauge financial health to assess safety of holdings.
  • Review volumes, clients, services to evaluate operational competence.
  • Analyze investor grievances to identify service deficiencies.

This transparency assists investors in prudently selecting the DP that best serves their interests and risk appetite.

Thus, SEBI’s regulatory approach strengthens DPs across all parameters that matter for investor protection and empowerment. Robust SEBI oversight upholds investor rights and safeguards their assets and interests.

 

Assessment of Effectiveness and Gaps

By regulating key aspects like registration, compliance, grievance redressal and enforcement, SEBI’s framework covers the major areas that impact investor interests in the depository system.

Stringent eligibility criteria, service standards and transparency requirements have enhanced the governance, systems and capabilities of DPs. This has boosted investor confidence, evident in the growing use of the demat route for settlement. Retail participation in equity markets has also increased owing to the convenience and security assured by regulated depository infrastructure.

However, certain gaps need to be addressed to make oversight more robust:

  • Delays are sometimes experienced in resolving investor complaints logged through SCORES within the prescribed 30 days. Stricter monitoring of resolution timeliness is required.
  • Enforcement actions like suspension or cancellation of DP registration for major violations happen sporadically. The enforcement process needs to be made more frequent and time-bound to deter non-compliance strongly.
  • Audits mandated by SEBI are compliance oriented. More audits focused on testing effectiveness of investor protection systems are needed.
  • Disclosures by DPs occasionally lack key details sought by investors to make informed choices. Disclosure standards must be strengthened.

Thus, while SEBI’s regulation has enormously strengthened the depository eco-system, enhancing enforcement and mandating rigorous disclosures can help address residual gaps in investor safeguards. This will make regulation more robust and ensure seamless depository services.

 

Conclusion

SEBI’s comprehensive regulatory framework for depository participants has been the bedrock enabling India to build a trusted and robust depository infrastructure for secure paperless securities settlement. Its emphasis on governance, systems and transparency has been pivotal for earning investors’ faith in dematerialization. As the market continues to grow rapidly, SEBI must build further capacity for enforcement and oversight to promptly address emerging challenges. Enhancing disclosure requirements and risk-focused audits are key to plugging potential regulatory gaps. With the continuous evolution of regulation to fully protect investor rights, SEBI will cement the growth of Indian capital markets in the 21st century digital age through a world-class depository mechanism.

 

References

  1. This article was originally written by Reserve Bank of India published on the RBI website. The link for the same is: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/BS_ViewBulletin.aspx?Id=13473

 

  1. This article was originally written by Mondaq published on the Mondaq website. The link for the same is: https://www.mondaq.com/india/securities/168348/depository-system-in-india

 

  1. This article was originally written by S. Srinivasan published on the Hindu Business Line website. The link for the same is: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/portfolio/technically-speaking/the-working-of-depositories/article20570208.ece  

 

  1. This article was originally written by Mahendra Sharma published on the India Corporate Law blog. The link for the same is: https://corporate.cyrilamarchandblogs.com/2021/04/sebis-regulatory-measures-during-covid-19/

 

  1. This article was originally written by Bloomberg Quint published on the Bloomberg Quint website. The link for the same is: https://www.bloombergquint.com/law-and-policy/sebi-tightens-noose-on-depository-participants-auditors-to-ensure-better-compliance

 

  1. This release was originally published by Nishith Desai Associates published on the NDA website. The link for the same is:  http://www.nishithdesai.com/New_Hotline/Capital_Markets_Hotline/Capital_Markets_Hotline_Jan2803.htm  

 

  1. This article was originally written by Mint published on the Mint website. The link for the same is: https://www.livemint.com/Money/XCBISPHdMV1WvnkBNCDPAL/The-role-and-regulations-for-depository-participants-in-Ind.html

 

  1. This article was originally written by TaxGuru published on the TaxGuru website. The link for the same is: https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-inspections-depository-participants.html

 

  1. This release was originally published by AZB & Partners published on the AZB & Partners website. The link for the same is: https://www.azbpartners.com/bank/SEBI-Introduces-the-Securities-and-Exchange-Board-of-India-Depositories-and-Participants-Amendment-Regulations-2022

 

  1. This article was originally written by CNBC TV18 published on the CNBC TV18 website. The link for the same is: https://www.cnbctv18.com/market/sebi-fines-nfil-icici-bank-hslc-shcil-services-8-lakh-for-violating-norms-11877642.htm.  

 

  1. This article was originally written by Scroll.in published on the Scroll website. The link for the same is: https://scroll.in/article/738632/explainer-how-does-the-depository-system-in-indian-stock-markets-work

 

  1. This release was originally published by Corporate Professionals published on the Corporate Professionals website. The link for the same is: https://corporateprofessionals.com/sebi-issues-consultation-paper-to-streamline-registration-requirements-and-compliance-obligations-of-depository-participants/

 

Related articles