January 14, 2024

Social Stigma surrounding Live in Relationships

This article is written by Manisha Bhadade of 3rd Semester of Dr. Ambedkar college, Department of Law, Deekshabhomi, Nagpur, Maharashtra .

 

ABSTRACT 

This abstract explores the intricate dynamics of the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships in the context of Indian society. Drawing on historical perspectives, cultural influences, family expectations, legal considerations, and evolving societal dynamics, it examines the multifaceted challenges faced by couples opting for non-traditional relationship structures. The historical reverence for marriage, deeply ingrained cultural norms, and familial expectations contribute to persistent societal stigmas. However, urbanization, changing youth attitudes, and progressive voices are challenging these norms. Legal recognition, though evolving, remains a significant factor, influencing the rights and protections available to couples. The abstract delves into the nuanced complexities couples encounter, including familial opposition, societal judgment, legal ambiguities, and the impact on children. It highlights the emerging narrative of resilience and societal evolution, with progressive voices and legal reforms pointing towards a more inclusive understanding of diverse relationship dynamics. As India navigates this delicate balance between tradition and modernity, the abstract calls for collective efforts to foster open dialogue and challenge outdated norms for a society that embraces the diversity of love and commitment.

 

INTRODUCTION 

In the vast and diverse canvas of India, where traditions are woven into the very fabric of societal norms, the emergence of live-in relationships has ignited a profound dialogue on relationships, autonomy, and societal expectations. Rooted in a historical and cultural landscape that venerates the institution of marriage as sacrosanct, the concept of couples choosing to cohabit without formalizing their commitment through marriage has encountered a complex and at times, contentious, reception. India, known for its rich tapestry of traditions and family values, finds itself at a crossroads where the dynamics of relationships are evolving alongside rapid socio-economic changes. Live in relationships, once considered a departure from the norm, have become more prevalent, especially in urban settings. However, this shift is met with a persistent social stigma that echoes historical narratives, cultural expectations, and familial traditions deeply embedded in the collective consciousness.

The societal perception of live-in relationships in India is intricately linked to cultural and religious influences that have historically shaped social norms. The sanctity attached to marriage as a societal cornerstone often casts a shadow of skepticism on those who opt for cohabitation outside the bounds of matrimony. Moreover, the close knit nature of Indian families, where decisions about relationships are often communal, adds another layer to the intricacies of navigating this unconventional path. While the legal landscape in India has seen advancements acknowledging the rights of consenting adults to live together without marriage, societal attitudes continue to grapple with the implications of this shift. The portrayal of relationships in media and popular culture further complicates the narrative, with traditional norms often perpetuated and non-conventional choices viewed through a lens of moral ambiguity. This intricate interplay of historical, cultural, familial, and legal factors weaves a complex narrative around the social stigma attached to live-in relationships in India. As the nation undergoes transformative changes, both socially and economically, the tensions between tradition and modernity come to the forefront. Exploring the depths of this social stigma is not merely an examination of relationship dynamics but an exploration of the evolving identity of Indian society at the crossroads of tradition and contemporary values.

 

Historical Perspectives:

Delving into the historical roots of the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships in India unveils a narrative deeply intertwined with cultural and traditional norms. Historically, India has been a tapestry of diverse communities, each with its own set of customs and values. Marriage, viewed as a sacred institution, played a pivotal role in shaping societal structures. Ancient Indian texts and religious doctrines often emphasized the sanctity of marriage, portraying it as a sacrament and a cornerstone of familial stability. The preservation of lineage and adherence to societal expectations were deeply ingrained in these narratives, laying the foundation for a collective reverence towards matrimonial unions. During various historical periods, societal norms were reinforced through caste systems and community expectations, further solidifying the significance of marital bonds. Any deviation from this established norm, such as the emergence of live-in relationships, was likely met with suspicion and disapproval, as it challenged the traditional order. The colonial era introduced Victorian values that influenced societal attitudes toward relationships. The Victorian emphasis on moral rectitude and conservative values left a lasting impact on India, contributing to the perception that deviations from conventional relationship structures were morally questionable. Post-independence, as India went through a process of nation-building and cultural redefinition, the traditional family structure continued to be idealized. The societal emphasis on family honor and community acceptance remained strong, reinforcing the notion that relationships outside the framework of marriage were contrary to established norms. While history provides the backdrop for the prevailing social stigma, it is essential to recognize that societal attitudes are dynamic and subject to change. The roots of the stigma surrounding live-in relationships in India are entwined with historical narratives, but the evolving nature of societal perspectives suggests the potential for a gradual shift in attitudes as the country grapples with the delicate balance between tradition and the demands of a changing world.

 

Social Stigma over live-in relationship:

While the concept of live-in relationship has gained recognition in many countries around the globe, it is still considered a taboo in India and has a social stigma attached to it. This opinion is intensely ingrained in the conservative Indian society because such an arrangement is based on the notion of cohabitation without marriage and pre-marital sex.[v] The partners in a live-in relationship are under constant scrutiny and resentful stares of the society and often face difficulties to find accommodation in metropolitan cities where the landlords are reluctant to provide them a place of living. The children born out of such an arrangement are considered illegitimate in the eyes of the society and women are called ‘vulnerable’[vi] for cohabiting in an unstable form of relationship which is considered immoral, unethical and against the religious principles. Same-sex partners cohabiting in a live-in relationship are frowned upon by the society. This social stigma surrounding live-in relationship clouds the legal stance of women.

 

Cultural and Religious Influences:

The social stigma surrounding live-in relationships in India is deeply influenced by the intricate interplay of cultural and religious factors that have historically shaped societal norms. India, a land of diverse traditions and religious practices, has long held marriage as a sacred institution, creating a cultural backdrop that plays a pivotal role in the perception of alternative relationship structures.

1.Religious Perspectives: Religious doctrines in India often emphasize the sanctity of marriage, portraying it as a sacrament essential for spiritual and societal well-being. Hinduism, with its emphasis on dharma (duty) and the concept of “Grihastha Ashrama” (household life), has traditionally advocated for the married life as a path to spiritual fulfillment. Similarly, other major religions in India, such as Islam and Christianity, place a high value on the formalization of relationships through marriage.

2.Cultural Norms: Cultural traditions in India are closely intertwined with religious beliefs, further reinforcing the significance of marital bonds. The preservation of family honor, adherence to societal expectations, and the continuity of lineage are deeply embedded cultural values. Live-in relationships, challenging these cultural norms, are often viewed as a departure from established traditions, inviting societal skepticism and disapproval.

3.Arranged Marriages: The prevalent practice of arranged marriages in many Indian communities is a testament to the strong influence of cultural and religious values. Arranged marriages are often seen as a harmonious merging of families, aligning with cultural expectations and religious principles. The contrast with live-in relationships, perceived as individual choices outside familial control, adds to the cultural and religious discord. 

4.Patriarchy and Gender Roles: Cultural and religious influences also contribute to the perpetuation of traditional gender roles and patriarchal structures. The expectation that relationships should culminate in marriage often reinforces unequal power dynamics. Live-in relationships, challenging these established norms, may face resistance due to the perceived threat they pose to traditional gender roles. While cultural and religious influences continue to shape societal attitudes, it is crucial to note that these influences are not static. India’s cultural and religious landscape is diverse, and within this diversity lie the seeds of change. As the country undergoes social transformations, a nuanced understanding of how cultural and religious factors contribute to the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships is essential for fostering open dialogue and progressive societal shifts.

 

Family and Community Expectations:

In the complex societal milieu of India, family and community expectations play a pivotal role in shaping attitudes towards relationships, contributing significantly to the social stigma surrounding live-in arrangements. The closely-knit nature of Indian families, where decisions about relationships are often communal rather than individual, adds layers of complexity to the dynamics of cohabitation outside of marriage.

1.Emphasis on Family Honor: Indian families traditionally place a high premium on maintaining family honor and reputation. Marriages are often seen as alliances between families rather than just individuals. The prospect of live-in relationships, viewed as divergent from the norm, can be perceived as a challenge to the family’s reputation, leading to resistance and societal disapproval.

2.Communal Decision-Making:The decision-making process regarding relationships in India is frequently communal, involving not only the individuals involved but also extended family members. Live-in relationships, being relatively unconventional, may clash with the collective expectations of family and community, resulting in tension and opposition.

3.Interplay of Generational Perspectives: Generational differences in outlook contribute to the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships. Older generations, often more rooted in traditional values, may find it challenging to accept non-conventional relationship structures, while younger generations, exposed to diverse perspectives, may be more open to alternative arrangements.

4.Impact on Siblings and Offspring:The social stigma surrounding live-in relationships is not limited to the couples involved; it extends to the impact on siblings and offspring. Families may fear societal judgment, affecting the marriage prospects of other family members. The potential impact on children born out of live-in relationships can also be a source of concern for families.

5.Pressure to Conform: Social expectations place significant pressure on individuals to conform to established norms. The fear of ostracization and strained familial relationships often compels individuals to adhere to traditional paths, even if their personal inclinations lean towards non-conventional choices. Navigating family and community expectations in the context of live-in relationships requires individuals to strike a delicate balance between personal autonomy and societal conformity. As societal attitudes continue to evolve, fostering open conversations within families becomes crucial to bridging the gap between traditional expectations and the changing dynamics of modern relationships in India.

 

Media and Popular Culture:

In the evolving narrative of relationships in India, the influence of media and popular culture cannot be understated. The portrayal of live-in relationships in movies, television shows, and other forms of entertainment significantly contributes to shaping public perception and reinforcing or challenging social norms.

1.Traditional Narratives in Bollywood: Bollywood, as a powerful cultural influencer, often reflects and reinforces societal norms. Historically, mainstream Indian cinema has predominantly upheld traditional narratives centered around marriage and family values. Live-in relationships, if depicted, are often sensationalized or portrayed as unconventional, contributing to the perpetuation of social stigma.

2.Morality and Sensationalism: Media tends to sensationalize non-conventional relationships, emphasizing moral dilemmas and societal taboos. This portrayal, rather than presenting a nuanced view, may contribute to the stigmatization of live-in relationships by framing them as morally questionable or socially disruptive.

3.Impact on Public Perception: The depiction of live-in relationships in popular culture shapes public perception, influencing how individuals perceive and judge those in such arrangements. The lack of diverse and realistic portrayals may contribute to a narrow understanding of alternative relationship structures, further fueling societal biases.

4.Generational Shifts in Media: With the rise of digital platforms and changing audience preferences, there is a noticeable shift in content that reflects more diverse and realistic relationship dynamics. Independent films and web series often explore the complexities of modern relationships, challenging traditional narratives and contributing to a more nuanced understanding.

5.Normalization Efforts: Some segments of media are making efforts to normalize live-in relationships by presenting them as legitimate choices. Progressive narratives that emphasize individual agency and the right to choose one’s path are slowly gaining ground, contributing to a gradual shift in societal attitudes. As India continues to grapple with the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships, the role of media and popular culture remains a dynamic factor. The need for more diverse and inclusive storytelling that reflects the realities of modern relationships is crucial for challenging existing norms and fostering a more open-minded and accepting society.

 

Legal Landscape:

The legal framework surrounding live-in relationships in India has undergone significant developments, contributing to both the recognition and, in some cases, the continued social stigma associated with such arrangements.

1.Recognition by the Supreme Court: The Supreme Court of India has played a crucial role in shaping the legal landscape around live-in relationships. Landmark judgments, such as the one in the case of Indra Sarma vs. V.K.V. Sarma, recognized the right of consenting adults to live together without marriage. Despite these legal pronouncements, societal attitudes often lag behind, perpetuating the social stigma.

2.Lack of Comprehensive Legislation:While there is judicial recognition of live-in relationships, India lacks comprehensive legislation specifically addressing the rights and responsibilities of couples in such arrangements. The absence of clear legal guidelines can leave individuals in live-in relationships vulnerable to societal judgment and discrimination.

3.Legal Ambiguities and Social Backlash: The absence of a robust legal framework contributes to uncertainties and legal ambiguities for couples in live-in relationships. This legal vacuum can be exploited by those seeking to reinforce social stigma, as individuals may hesitate to openly embrace their relationship status due to the fear of potential legal repercussions or societal backlash.

4.Property and Inheritance Rights:One significant aspect of the legal landscape pertains to property and inheritance rights for couples in live-in relationships. While there have been cases where courts recognized the right to maintenance and financial support for partners in such relationships, the lack of clear statutory provisions may hinder the full realization of these rights.

5.Changing Perspectives through Legal Recognition: Despite these challenges, legal recognition and evolving perspectives are intertwined. As more legal judgments affirm the legitimacy of live-in relationships, they contribute to changing societal attitudes. Legal recognition helps validate these relationships, gradually chipping away at the social stigma associated with them.

6.Progressive Legal Initiatives: Some states in India have taken progressive steps to address the legal aspects of live-in relationships. For example, the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, provides protection to women in live in relationships from domestic violence. Such legal initiatives contribute to a more inclusive legal framework and signal a departure from traditional norms. In navigating the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships, the legal landscape in India stands at a crossroads. While legal recognition and progressive initiatives are steps in the right direction, there is a pressing need for comprehensive legislation that not only safeguards the rights of individuals in such relationships but also contributes to broader societal acceptance and understanding.

 

Changing Dynamics and Progressive Voices:

Amidst the entrenched societal norms and historical perspectives in India, there emerges a palpable shift in dynamics and a growing chorus of progressive voices challenging the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships.

1.Urbanization and Globalization:The dynamics of Indian society are undergoing profound changes, catalyzed by urbanization and globalization. Urban centers, acting as crucibles of diverse influences, are witnessing a departure from traditional norms. Exposure to global perspectives and lifestyles is fostering a more open-minded approach, contributing to the acceptance of alternative relationship structures.

2.Evolving Attitudes of the Youth: The younger generation, raised in an era of increased connectivity and information, exhibits more liberal attitudes toward relationships. With exposure to diverse cultural narratives through digital media, the youth is at the forefront of challenging traditional norms, advocating for individual autonomy, and embracing a more inclusive understanding of love and commitment.

3.Educational Empowerment: Increasing educational opportunities for women and a shift towards career-focused aspirations have empowered individuals to question societal norms. As education becomes a catalyst for change, individuals, particularly women, are asserting their agency in matters of relationships, contributing to the changing dynamics and challenging established stigmas.

4.Social Media and Activism: Social media platforms have become powerful tools for activism and advocacy. Progressive voices, including activists, influencers, and individuals openly sharing their stories, use these platforms to challenge stereotypes and promote understanding. The online discourse is instrumental in creating a sense of community for those navigating non-traditional relationship paths.

5.Artistic Expressions:The realm of arts and literature is increasingly becoming a space for exploring diverse relationship dynamics. Independent films, literature, and other artistic expressions are portraying live-in relationships in a nuanced manner, contributing to a more empathetic understanding and challenging the one-dimensional narratives perpetuated by mainstream media.

6.Legal Reforms: The legal landscape, albeit evolving, reflects a progressive shift. Judgments affirming the rights of individuals in live-in relationships and protective legal measures contribute to legitimizing such arrangements. As legal reforms continue to address the gaps in recognizing and protecting the rights of couples in non-marital unions, they serve as a beacon of hope for progressive change. In the face of social stigma, these changing dynamics and the emergence of progressive voices signify a society in flux. While deeply rooted norms and historical perspectives persist, the momentum of change driven by urbanization, youth empowerment, education, social media, artistic expression, and legal reforms is fostering a more inclusive and understanding approach toward live-in relationships in India. As these dynamics continue to evolve, they carve a path towards a society that embraces diversity in matters of the heart.

 

Challenges Faced by Couples:

Couples navigating live-in relationships in India encounter a myriad of challenges stemming from the deeply ingrained social stigma associated with such arrangements. These challenges permeate various aspects of their lives, influencing relationships with families, societal acceptance, legal recognition, and their own emotional well-being.

1.Familial Opposition: One of the foremost challenges is often the opposition from families. The expectation of adhering to traditional norms, preserving family honor, and concerns about societal judgment can lead to strained relationships with parents and extended family members. Couples may grapple with the difficult choice between familial acceptance and pursuing their chosen path.

2.Societal Judgment and Discrimination: The social stigma surrounding live-in relationships exposes couples to judgment and discrimination from society at large. Gossip, moral scrutiny, and ostracization can result in emotional distress and a sense of isolation. The fear of being perceived as ‘outside’ societal norms can impact the couple’s mental well-being.

3.Legal Ambiguities: Despite certain legal recognitions, the absence of comprehensive legislation addressing the rights and responsibilities of couples in live-in relationships poses legal challenges. Issues related to property rights, inheritance, and financial support may remain ambiguous, leaving couples vulnerable to legal uncertainties.

4.Secrecy and Lack of Social Recognition: Fearing societal judgment, many couples in live-in relationships may choose to keep their status concealed. This secrecy can lead to a lack of social recognition, preventing the couple from openly participating in community events or receiving support from friends and neighbors.

5.Pressure to Conform: The societal pressure to conform to traditional norms can be overwhelming. Couples may feel compelled to justify their choices constantly, leading to emotional exhaustion. The pressure to conform not only affects the couple’s relationship but also their individual autonomy and mental health.

6.Impact on Children: If the couple has children, the social stigma surrounding their relationship can have implications for the family dynamics. Children born out of wedlock may face societal prejudice, affecting their sense of identity and belonging. The couple must navigate the delicate balance of shielding their children from judgment while fostering a healthy family environment.

7.Limited Legal Protections: While there is a growing recognition of the rights of individuals in live-in relationships, the legal protections remain limited. Couples may face challenges in accessing legal remedies in case of disputes, domestic violence, or the breakdown of the relationship. Couples in live in relationships in India, therefore, find themselves at the intersection of societal expectations, familial ties, legal uncertainties, and the quest for individual autonomy. Navigating these challenges requires resilience, open communication, and, often, a reevaluation of societal norms to foster a more inclusive understanding of diverse relationship dynamics.

 

CONCLUSION 

In conclusion, the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships in India reveals a nuanced tapestry of societal norms, cultural expectations, and evolving dynamics. As couples navigate the uncharted waters of cohabitation outside traditional wedlock, they encounter resistance rooted in historical narratives and deeply ingrained beliefs. However, amidst the complexities, there are signs of change a gradual shift in attitudes propelled by urbanization, exposure to diverse perspectives, and a growing discourse on individual autonomy. The challenges faced by couples in live-in relationships reflect a broader societal conversation about the delicate balance between tradition and modernity. Bridging this gap requires open dialogue, understanding, and a willingness to redefine societal expectations. As India continues its journey through social transformation, acknowledging and addressing the social stigma surrounding live-in relationships becomes essential for fostering a more inclusive and accepting society—one that respects the diverse paths individuals choose in matters of the heart. The evolving narrative around live-in relationships is not just a reflection of changing relationship dynamics but a mirror held up to the evolving identity of contemporary India.

 

REFRENCES :

[1]https://www.samvidhi.org/post/live-in-relationships-in-india-pervasive-myths-social-stigma-and-legal-status

[2]https://www.indiatimes.com/lifestyle/mental-health/live-in-relationships-and-peoples-stance-on-it-585744.html

[3]https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2631831820974585

[4]https://legalstudymaterial.com/live-in-relationships/

[5]https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/12/30/live-in-relationships-social-myths-legal-realities-and-the-way-forward/

 

Related articles