INTRODUCTION
Hindu law is composed of different texts and scriptures; the development of Hindu law was both natural and, at times, aided by laws implemented during the British period. There are two types of Hindu legal sources: ancient and modern.
Ancient sources include religious texts such as shrutis and smritis, as well as several Upanishads, which were also part of Hindu law.
Shruti as a source of law
Shruti is derived from the word “shur” which means “to hear.” Shrutis are regarded as the primary source of Hindu law. Shruti is also known as Veda. According to Hindu law, there are four Vedas: the Rigveda, the Samveda, the Yajurveda, and the Atharveda. The brahmins used to read out to the public what was written in the Vedas. Because brahmins were seen to be learned people, anything they said was of extreme significance and was regarded to be the law of the nation, shrutis include what the brahmins wrote and uttered. Brahmins also explain the tasks that an individual must follow and how to carry them out. The substance of these responsibilities may be found in the Upanishads.
Smriti as a source of law
Smriti is derived from the Sanskrit word “smri” which meaning “to remember.” Smrtis are those sections of shrutis that the sages neglected to explain in their original form and so wrote down in the language that they were familiar with; hence, shrutis are considered the foundation of smritis. Smritis are classified into two types: Dharmasastras and Dharmasutras. Dharmasastras include laws governing Hindu moral behaviour, whereas Dharmasutras contain rules governing governance, caste, interpersonal relationships, economic concerns, eating habits, and so on. There are so many smritis that it is impossible to list them all, but two of the most well-known are the Yajnavalkya smriti and the Manusmriti. Manusmriti is also said to be Manu’s first legal book.
Digests and Commentaries
The digests and commentaries made by various authors of Hindu law are the third most significant source of law. Commentaries typically remark on the smritis, and their time span ranges from the 7th century until 1800 AD. The basis of numerous schools of Hindu law was also built through commentaries. The digests comprise the most significant features of all the smritis, as well as discussions about their reconciliation and contradictions. Various digests and commentaries on the two most prominent smritis, manusmriti and yajnavalkya smriti, have been produced by various writers.
Customs
Customs are the most significant and oldest type of lawmaking; they refer to the traditions, practises, and activities that people have followed for centuries and have been recognised as law over time. The premise of treating customs as a key source of law is that individuals obey conventions, and if such practises are not damaging to society, the state has no trouble recognising them. In order for a custom to become legislation, it must meet certain criteria, including being legitimate, continuing, being followed by a substantial number of people, and not being discriminatory or contrary to public policy.
Indian law has recognized 3 types of custom namely:
- Local customs– These are customs that are common in a certain geographic location.
- Class customs– These are the customs that are common amongst a specific class.
- Family customs– These are the customs that all members of the family must follow.
CONCLUSION
It has been observed that Hindu law has been criticised for its rigidity, patriarchal nature, and lack of a highly contemporary social vision. There are other areas where Hindu law needs to be improved. For example, the irretrievable breakdown hypothesis as a sufficient cause for divorce is still not recognised under the Hindu Marriage Act of 1955, and even the Supreme Court has voiced worry about this.
REFERENCES
- http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/329/Sources-of-Hindu-Law.html
- https://indianlegalsolution.com/sources-of-hindu-law/
- https://blog.ipleaders.in/sources-of-family-law/#:~:text=Shrutis%20are%20considered%20to%20be,these%20Vedas%20to%20the%20people.
hwarya Says:
I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.
If you are interested in participating in the same, do let me know.
Do follow me on Facebook, Twitter Youtube and Instagram.
The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.
If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at secondinnings.hr@gmail.com
In the year 2021, we wrote about 1000 Inspirational Women In India, in the year 2022, we would be featuring 5000 Start Up Stories.