February 1, 2024

The Security Council and the Ukaraine crisis: sanctions and peacekeeping

This Article is written by Sunaina of 6th Semester from Panjab University, Department of LAW, Chandigarh, Punjab

 

Abstract: The United Nations Security Council has been actively participating in the Ukraine crisis resolution. However, this crisis was triggered by the Russian Federation invading Ukraine. efforts to ensure international peace and security in the area have involved focus on the Security Council. The Council adopted the resolutions and imposed sanctions to respond to the situation. It has also participated in peace-making and setting up of sanctions frameworks. Evidence of the Ukraine crisis that still preoccupies the Security Council can be seen in its struggles to deal with abrupt terminations of crucial UN peace and security mechanisms in conflict situations.

Keywords: Security, Council, Federation, Peace, Conflict

 

Understanding the Ukraine Crisis

1st The Ukraine crisis involves the on-going war between Ukraine and Russia originating in 2014 with Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the insurgency in eastern Ukraine. The conflict-affected region, known as the Donbas , accounts for almost all of the country’s coal production. This region further contributes to the mining and production of metals and generation of power. ## These measures aim to apply pressure on Russia and discourage more aggression while also supporting Ukraine as regards their territorial integrity and sovereignty. These smart sanctions imposed by the international community aim to punish key individuals and entities responsible for the conflict, such as Russian government officials and company employees. The United Nations Security Council has taken an important role in resolving the Ukraine crisis as it supports and carries out punitive measures against Russia. The fact that the Security Council imposes sanctions in connection with the Ukraine crisis demonstrates its dedication to preserving international peace and security.

 

Role of the Security Council in Ukraine Crisis: The current crisis in Ukraine marked by the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 and subsequent conflict raised in Eastern Ukraine has been a major concern for the United Nations Security Council. The UNSC as the main international organization whose responsibility is to ensure peace and security, has taken various actions concerning the Ukraine crisis. Here are key aspects of the Security Council’s role:
Condemnations and Resolutions:
The UNSC has passed various resolutions and declarations against Russia’s actions in Ukraine. These resolutions have highlighted the concepts of sovereignty, territorial integrity and non-use of force.
Sanctions:
The Security Council has imposed sanctions against Russia for its actions in Ukraine. These sanctions have been imposed against certain individuals, entities and sectors of the Russian economy. The objective is to compel Russia to respect international law and pursue peaceful diplomacy for the resolution of the conflict.
Diplomacy and Mediation:
The UNSC has been a place for diplomatic debates and attempts to reach peaceful resolution of the crisis. It serves as a platform for the member states where they can air their grievances and make recommendations.
Support for Diplomatic Initiatives:
The UNSC has expressed support for diplomatic initiatives that aimed to resolve the conflict, including the Minsk agreements. These arrangements, which are conducted under the auspices of Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), provide a roadmap on how to achieve a ceasefire and settle political issues in Eastern Ukraine.

Peacekeeping Discussions:
There had been debates within the UNSC regarding a potential deployment of UN peacekeepers to the war zone. Its goal would be to establish a safe environment for negotiation and protect the civilians. However, it has been difficult to be able to reach an agreement on the terms and scope of such a mission.
Humanitarian Concerns:
It has addressed the humanitarian issue arising from the conflict through relocating the non-combatants and providing aid to them. Resolutions and statements have also highlighted the need to assist those going through a crisis.
Political Statements and Expressions of Concern:
The Security Council makes statements often to show concern regarding the situation in Ukraine. These statements usually call for the immediate cessation of hostilities, compliance with international law and protection of civilians.
Well noting the fact that any action by the Security Council whether taken or not primarily depends on the geopolitical interests of its member states especially for P5 i Noting sometimes how frustratingly limiting this has been through dispute of differing positions amongst major powers including; United States, Russia, China The United Kingdom and France.

Exploring Sanctions as a Tool for Conflict Resolution: In discussing sanctions as a mechanism of conflict resolution, it is essential to know the different types of sanction that may be used in efforts to confront behaviors that go against codes of community conduct. Some of these are diplomatic sanctions, educational sanctions, university status sanctions, organizational sanctions, administrative sanction; Parental notifications also form part and parcel of the system. 

To have these sanctions tailored to specific situations means that it is possible to impose consequences corresponding to the gravity of the behavior and its effect on society.
Sanctions are effective tools to solve problems because they act as disincentives that promote compliance with rules and norms. Their effectiveness depends on the suitability to the situation, seriousness of the behavior and effect on society. When customized for unique situations, sanctions are effective in preserving order, fostering accountability and helping find solutions to conflicts. Their efficiency is facilitated by the adherence to the standards and support of the community.

The use of sanctions as a conflict resolution tool, however, should also consider its possible negative consequences. These disadvantages include an increased potential for aggravating conflict, hurting innocent people, fostering resentment or animosity and economic woes to parties targeted. Furthermore, the possibility exists that sanctions may not effectively change the behavior of the targeted parties and hence result in an endless conflict. Furthermore, sanctions can place strain on diplomatic relations and ultimately result in a breakdown of communication means that it becomes difficult if not impossible to find a peaceful solution.
There are some renowned cases in history where sanctions served the purpose of conflict resolution. for instance, U.S. imposed embargo on Iran during the Iran-Iraq War severely damaged Iran’s military power. The U. N. ## Security Council would regularly sanction to address civil wars and national strife, especially in Africa and Yugoslavia.

 

Impact of Sanctions on Ukraine: 

Economic Impact:
The sanctions on Russia have severely affected Ukraine’s economy. The poverty in the country has increased from 5.5% to 24.2%, with about 7.1million more people into poverty levels. The war has also affected agricultural production with job loss and food insecurity killing one of every three households of Ukrainian. In addition, the conflict has forced over six million people to leave Ukraine following about 15% of pre-war population.
Political Implications:
Political implications of international sanctions imposed on Russia in the course of Russo-Ukrainian War are also considerable. They are targeted at liquidating the ability of Russia to fund the war and focus on those members from the political, military and economic elite who are directly responsible for the conflict. These sanctions are aimed at making it clear to Russia’s political elite to pay economic and political prices for their actions, weakening the economic base of Russia, reducing Kremlin’s capacity to finance the war. This is part of a wider strategy aimed at punishing Russia for what it did and supporting Ukraine sovereignty and territorial integrity.

The Role of Peacekeeping in the Ukraine Crisis: The Role of Peacekeeping in the Ukraine Crisis

The roles of peacekeeping operations in conflict resolution and post conflict situations are very significant. In the case of the Ukraine crisis, the potential roles of peacekeeping include:
Ending Armed Conflicts:
Maintaining Ceasefires: Peace keeping forces can also be introduced to help monitor and make sure that the ceasefire holds and hostilities do not increase further so as to provide an environment where dialogue and negotiations can take place.
Protecting Civilians: Another important peacekeeping role is to safeguard civilians caught up during the conflict, especially in areas where humanitarian aid is so vital. So, peacekeepers can act as a barrier between conflicting parties to ensure the wellbeing of people.
Humanitarian Assistance: On the one hand, peacekeeping operations can participate in humanitarian aid such as providing medical care, food and temporary shelter for people affected by war in Ukraine especially internally displaced people or those residing in conflict-hit areas.
Post-Conflict Reconstruction: Post-conflict reconstruction can also be assisted by peacekeeping missions following the cessation of hostilities such as providing a safe environment for displaced populations to return, facilitating provision of necessary support mechanisms and infrastructure rebuilding.
Monitoring and Adjudication: Peacekeeping forces can monitor elections, ensure humane treatment of prisoners of war or help in the processes of post-conflict justice and reconciliation.
Legitimization and Delegitimization: Border changes as a result of the conflict could also be legitimized or delegitimised by peacekeeping missions to help resolve territorial disputes.
In summary, peacekeeping operations may help in controlling the conflict, protecting civilians, supporting negotiation processes and participating in successful settlement of the Ukraine crisis. These actions are in line with the overall goal of peacekeeping, which is to ensure that there is established and maintained peace within regions of conflict so as to ensure stability and security.

Outcomes of Security Council’s Intervention in Ukraine: 

The Security Council has taken several actions and interventions towards dealing with the crisis in Ukraine. 50 meetings of special focus on Ukraine were held by the Council in 2022. It involved open briefings, adoptions Arria-formula meetings and discussions under “any other business.”
54 resolutions were adopted by the Council that outlines the intensity of its reaction to the crisis. These resolutions supported the Secretary-General’s efforts to find a peaceful solution, they condemned what Russia had done and that it remove its military forces from Ukraine and that Ukraine’s boundaries should be kept intact. The Council further submitted the situation in Ukraine to the General Assembly through observed “Uniting for Peace” procedure, with resultant adoption by the General Assembly of five resolutions on Ukraine.

As a response to the crisis, Security Council established its first sanctions regime for five years including asset freezes, travel bans, arms embargoes and other financial or trade restrictions. It also extended the mandates of peacekeeping operations underlining their vital contribution to addressing the crisis and maintaining peace in the region.

This illustrative plan shows the proactive and universal nature of the Council’s actions for resolving Ukraine crisis reflecting its dedication to maintaining international peace and security in this region. For a more detailed approach, additional details can be elaborated through the article titled “The Security Council, One Year After Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine” by Security Council Report and also through the official United Nations Security Council website that is all about sanctions.

Lessons Learned from the Ukraine Crisis for Global Security: The Ukraine crisis has yielded a number of important critical lessons for global security, these insights can be used to shape approaches and reactions in constructing frameworks that increase international security. Some of the key lessons learned from the Ukraine crisis include:

Collective Defense and Security Assistance: Ukraine crisis revealed the value of collective defense and security assistance, which are especially important in terms of response to aggression or external threats. It emphasized the importance of coordinated efforts by international allies in providing vital security assistance to nations facing security challenges.
Global Cooperation and Diplomacy: The crisis showed the importance of international cooperation and diplomacy in combating conflicts, security threats. The diplomatic maneuverings and worldwide assistance to Ukraine have shown that multilateralism can be effective in preventing conflicts and fostering peace.
Multifaceted Response Strategies: The strategies and mechanisms used to resolve the Ukraine crisis including providing security, humanitarian aid for affected areas granting measures against aggressor nations offering energy assistance showed that a multi-faceted approach stood out as significant. Based on this insight, a full-scale strategy that incorporates security, humanitarian assistance and economic measures can be useful in ending conflicts and increasing world security.
Protection of Democratic Values and Human Rights: The crisis reinforced the need to safeguard democratic principles and human rights in the defense of attacks from outside. The global security strategy can be supported by renewing emphasis on supporting democracy, human rights, and anti-corruption measures.

Energy Security and Supply Chain Vulnerabilities: Ukraine crisis highlighted the importance of energy security and vulnerability of supply chains. It has led to a reassessment of vulnerabilities in supply chain, consideration as to whether or not it is feasible to onshore or nearshore production and required provisioning of energy assistance toward the impacted nations.
Countering Disinformation and Cyber Threats: Disinformation and cyber threats gain more importance as part of global security activities.
Increasing Humanitarian Assistance: All in all, the crisis increased humanitarian aid’s role within conflict resolution and post-conflict situations. There emerges an increased awareness of the necessity to increase humanitarian aid, including provision of medical care, shelter and basic services in conflict-affected areas.

In conclusion: Peacekeeping operations can be helpful in terms of containing the conflict, protecting civilians, aiding negotiations and making it possible in some manner to end the Ukraine crisis. Such initiatives are in line with the overarching objectives of peacekeeping, which seeks to create and maintain peace within conflict areas to ensure stability and security.
Recognizing and applying these insights from the Ukraine crisis can help strengthen global security arrangements, develop better diplomatic approaches, bolster democratic norms, and build strong, well-coordinated reactions to potential security risks.

 

REFERENCES:

https://www.aljazeera.com/tag/ukraine-russia-crisis/

https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/conflict-ukraine

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ukraine

https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14808.doc.htm

https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/un-documents/ukraine/

https://www.jstor.org/stable/27203127

 

Related articles