I hope you have a great time reading this article. There is a small quiz for you at the end of the article.
Introduction
Contracts are the foundation of modern commerce. The Indian Contract Act, 1872, governs contracts in India and provides a legal framework for enforcing agreements. This legislation ensures that promises made in business and personal interactions are honored and legally binding. This article provides an in-depth analysis of the basic definitions under the Indian Contract Act, explores its historical roots, and explains important sections and landmark judgments relevant for law students.
Historical Background of the Indian Contract Act
The Indian Contract Act, 1872, was enacted during British rule and came into force on September 1, 1872. It was drafted based on English common law principles and aimed at creating a unified legal framework for contractual relationships in India. Initially, it consisted of 11 chapters. Over time, several parts of the Act were repealed, leaving primarily the general principles of the law of contracts and specific contracts such as contracts relating to indemnity, guarantee, bailment, pledge, and agency.
Today, the Indian Contract Act is divided into two parts:
- Part 1: General principles relating to the law of contracts (Section 1 to 75)
- Part 2: Special kinds of contracts (Contract relating to indemnity, guarantee, bailment, pledge, and agency)
Important Definitions under the Indian Contract Act
The Act begins by defining critical terms necessary for understanding the legal nature of contracts. These definitions are found in Section 2 of the Act.
- Agreement [Section 2(e)]
- An agreement is defined as “every promise and every set of promises forming the consideration for each other.”
- Explanation: An agreement is formed when one party makes a proposal or offer and the other party accepts it.
- Case Law: Balfour v. Balfour (1919) 2 KB 571 – The court held that social agreements are not legally enforceable.
- Contract [Section 2(h)]
- A contract is “an agreement enforceable by law.”
- Explanation: All contracts are agreements, but not all agreements are contracts. Only agreements with legal enforceability are considered contracts.
- Proposal/Offer [Section 2(a)]
- A proposal is when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or abstain from doing anything, to obtain the assent of the other.
- Case Law: Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] 1 QB 256 – Advertisement can be a general offer.
- Acceptance [Section 2(b)]
- When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent, the proposal is said to be accepted.
- Promise [Section 2(b)]
- A proposal when accepted becomes a promise.
- Consideration [Section 2(d)]
- Consideration is something in return. It is the price paid by one party for the promise of the other.
- Case Law: Currie v. Misa (1875) LR 10 Ex 153 – Consideration means a benefit to one party or a detriment to the other.
- Void Agreement [Section 2(g)]
- An agreement not enforceable by law is said to be void.
- Voidable Contract [Section 2(i)]
- A contract enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties but not at the option of the other(s).
- Void Contract [Section 2(j)]
- A contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void.
Essentials of a Valid Contract [Section 10]
Section 10 of the Act lists the essentials for a valid contract:
- Offer and acceptance
- Free consent
- Lawful consideration
- Capacity to contract
- Lawful object
- Not expressly declared void
Case Law: Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose (1903) ILR 30 Cal 539 (PC) – A minor’s agreement is void ab initio.Capacity to Contract [Section 11]
This section deals with who is competent to contract:
- Major
- Of sound mind
- Not disqualified by law
Case Law: Inder Singh v. Parmeshwardhari Singh AIR 1957 Pat 491 – Contract with a person of unsound mind is void.
Free Consent [Section 13 & 14]
Consent is free when it is not caused by:
- Coercion [Section 15]
- Undue influence [Section 16]
- Fraud [Section 17]
- Misrepresentation [Section 18]
- Mistake [Section 20-22]
Case Law: Ranganayakamma v. Alwar Setti AIR 1889 Mad 44 – Consent obtained under coercion is not free.
Lawful Consideration and Object [Section 23]
A contract must have lawful consideration and a lawful object. If the consideration or object is forbidden by law, fraudulent, or against public policy, the contract is void.
Agreements Expressly Declared Void [Sections 24–30]
- Agreements without consideration [Sec 25]
- Agreements in restraint of marriage [Sec 26]
- Agreements in restraint of trade [Sec 27]
- Agreements in restraint of legal proceedings [Sec 28]
- Agreements by way of wager [Sec 30]
Case Law: Madhub Chander v. Raj Coomar (1874) 14 BLR 76 – Wagering contracts are void.Contingent Contracts [Section 31-36]
These contracts depend upon the happening or non-happening of a future uncertain event.
Case Law: N.P.O. Finance Ltd. v. RBI AIR 2003 SC 1204 – Contingent contracts are enforceable only on occurrence of the event.
Performance of Contracts [Sections 37-67]
- Obligation to perform [Sec 37]
- By promisor himself or an agent
- Joint promises [Sec 42-45]
- Time and place for performance [Sec 46-50]
Case Law: Sushila Devi v. Hari Singh AIR 1971 SC 1756 – Performance must be according to contract.
Breach of Contract and Remedies [Section 73-75]
Section 73: Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract.
Case Law: Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341 – Damages must be foreseeable.
Section 74: Compensation for breach of contract where penalty is stipulated.
Case Law: Fateh Chand v. Balkishan Das AIR 1963 SC 1405 – Genuine pre-estimate of damages is allowed.
Section 75: Compensation to a party rightfully rescinding the contract.
Quasi-Contracts [Sections 68–72]
- Supply of necessaries to incapable persons [Sec 68]
- Payment by interested person [Sec 69]
- Obligation of a person enjoying benefit [Sec 70]
- Finder of goods [Sec 71]
- Money paid by mistake or under coercion [Sec 72]
Case Law: State of West Bengal v. B.K. Mondal AIR 1962 SC 779 – Recovery under quasi-contract when state benefited from contractor’s services.
Conclusion
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 forms the backbone of contract law in India. It is vital for law students to understand the definitions, essentials, and key sections that govern contractual obligations. With its roots in common law and its relevance to commercial transactions, the Act remains one of the most important pieces of legislation in Indian jurisprudence. Understanding the basics along with landmark judgments equips students and practitioners alike to appreciate its legal and practical nuances.
References:
- Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Bare Act)
- Avtar Singh, Law of Contract and Specific Relief
- Pollock & Mulla, Indian Contract Act and Specific Relief
- Relevant case laws cited above
If you enjoyed reading this article. Do check out this quiz here.